Oh, yea, Thank You Toma for your comment.
Bricks do not look as good as logs, although there are many good looking bricks. I have a couple old ones tagged “Anvil Island”, which I consider collectible. Bricks - they require fireing, and you certainly do not shit them. You must buy every brick from the store. It is just the nature of logs building, architecture (archaic tecture" of log building that attracts me.
I have to admit that to build with bricks in the middle of nowhere far in the forest, you must deliver those bricks, therefore pay full lot of cash, or do all the delivery, where as logs can well be found laying around and far not all logs rot, or get insects, some may last for centuries, preserving mega strength and natural beauty. It is not that I do not like bricks. Brick buildigs can be very warm, beautiful and safer than for instance concrete panel buildings (highrises). With respect to cuttig logs, it depends on a plan of a house, some may require minimal cutting.
“bricks>logs” what less is better!
toma discourse@talk.vanhack.ca wrote: toma Keyholder
November 20
Why logs?
Logs are big, heavy and they rot. Logs also burn, and you can get splinters, or sticky hands from the sap. They expand a bunch when they are wet, and shrink a bunch when it’s dry. Trees also don’t grow straight so you need expensive equipment to cut them straight.
Have you considered bricks? You could build a brick house. Bricks are easier to make. They are straight and don’t burn like flimsy logs. You don’t need to cut them, and sand them, and stain them, and paint them. Bricks don’t get termites, they are woodpecker proof. You can shit bricks. Bricks are a more superior building material than wood, or straw.
BRICKS>LOGS
To respond, reply to this email or visit Long log house for new Hackspace - #13 by toma in your browser.
To unsubscribe from these emails, visit your user preferences.
To stop receiving notifications about this particular topic, click here.