I think this contest could be made better by having site specific racks that acknowledge the history of the specific location where they are installed as opposed to a number of generic designs installed all over the city.
This is what Cycle Savers was attempting to do with the City of Vancouver.
This is great, I think I’m going to submit a design @chadleaman would Fusion360’s Drawing output be a good format to submit it? And can I post pictures here after my submission?
From their website though, looks like what they are wanting is:
WHAT WE WILL NEED
When completing the entry form, you will be asked for the following information:
• The name of your design
• The idea behind your design
• A single horizontal 8.5” x 11” page with illustration(s) of your design. JPEG or PDF formats only.
You may submit one file per design. The file can include one or more illustrations on a single sheet. It should not include personal information such as your name or contact information.
• You may submit up to two designs in total. Please complete one entry form for each design.
Reading between the lines, it sounds like making a nice rendering might go far on this, more than just technical drawings. But F360 can help there too!
The manufacturing issues is a good point, it very well may count against me. As for the security, I figured if the heart bike racks were okay, this wasn’t too far from it.
I don’t think my first design quite met the caneability requirement. I finally got around to redesigning with 1.5’’ round tubing and made it fully compliant. Seem better to you all?
That’s a neat idea! It’d definitely be less cost effective, but probably better to include fancier features for the contest. They can cut corners if they choose to